×
Convivium was a project of Cardus 2011‑2022, and is preserved here for archival purposes.
Search
Search
Taking responsibility togetherTaking responsibility together

Taking responsibility together

Well, it might not be the single biggest moral issue—I can think of one that is bigger—but, that aside, his words ring true. The state of life on native reserves in this country is an absolute disgrace. The idea that people in our land should suffer from the indignities experienced by those living on reserves—especially northern reserves—is shameful and cause for great national consternation.

Brian Dijkema
2 minute read

"It's an absolute disgrace. It's the single biggest moral issue we face as a country." So says Paul Martin about the state of life on Native reserves in Canada.

Well, it might not be the single biggest moral issue—I can think of one that is bigger—but, that aside, his words ring true. The state of life on native reserves in this country is an absolute disgrace. The idea that people in our land should suffer from the indignities experienced by those living on reserves—especially northern reserves—is shameful and cause for great national consternation. They are, as Mr. Martin puts it, "pictures of tragedy."

In this sense, Bob Rae's point in question period is well-put. The state of humanity on the native reserves—the squalor, the addictions, the abuse, the lack of basic amenities like clean water and a warm house, the rampant suicide—in Canada is "an embarrassment to the reputation of the entire country."

But his next point is a complete non-starter. In response to Harper's disappointment with the results of the $90 million sent to Attawapiskat over the last five years, Rae responded: "It would seem that the implication of what the Prime Minister is saying is that it is the people of Attawapiskat who are responsible for the problems they are facing."

Of course the people of Attawapiskat are responsible for the problems they're facing. To suggest otherwise is to suggest that they are somehow less than fully human; it degrades their humanity and has more than a whiff of colonialism to it.

But, let's be charitable to Mr. Rae and blame the mass media for his urge to make complex situations overly simple for the sake of scoring political points. It is true that the people of Attawapiskat aren't the only ones responsible for the problems they're facing. The problems at Attawapiskat—and reserves across the country—are a complex cauldron of abuse, mismanagement, moral waffling, lies, and other foul ingredients put into the pot by a variety of cooks, including the federal government.

The question in the face of this is: what is to be done? What type of action is needed, by whom, and towards what end?

This question, as I've said previously, cannot be answered simply with "more funding or better administered programs, but [requires] hard conversations about whose conception of the good is better." The problem, as a young person recently noted in John Ivison's column, is that there is "apathy and no world view" among those who lead, and this bleeds all the way down.

This is not to suggest that the answer will be black or white, or that it will be simple—fixing deeply rooted social problems requires complex analysis of structures and institutions. It also requires hard questions about how such things shape human behaviour for good or ill—what conditions help sustain or work against the virtues that make communities successful or problematic.

If we are ever to overcome—together—the shame of degraded human dignity that is so present among large communities of Canadian people, we need to call out those behaviours and structures which contribute to it, as well as the worldviews which fuel them.

You'll also enjoy...

A Double-Edged Sword

A Double-Edged Sword

But what happens if, in the effort to amputate these carcinogenic things, you cut too deep? What happens if you are removing the tumour next to the heart and you cause irreparable damage? I note this because public religion has as many—and I would argue more—positive things to offer the public as it...

Neither Too Simple Nor Too Complex: The Bangladesh Tragedy

Neither Too Simple Nor Too Complex: The Bangladesh Tragedy

But if the context is so complex, how are we to respond? Do we blame God for placing people in the swampy delta that is Bangladesh? Do we allow ourselves to be paralyzed by the complexity or fall headlong into rash action based on simple slogans? The tragedy in Bangladesh last week is at once madden...

Hope Against Those Who Have No Hope

Hope Against Those Who Have No Hope

Is the expression of "simple, unalloyed kindness" an appropriate response to the death of a tyrant so heinous as Kim Jung-Il? By all accounts he did his best to destroy everything that is good and beautiful and true in his country by making a god of himself, torturing Christians, starving his people...