When the legal system becomes the automatic proxy for settling social contention, hurry up and wait becomes the order of the day

By Peter Stockland December 3, 2014

1 minute read

Anyone seeking a hint of the headaches that loom from the Prentice government’s bid to square circles in Alberta schools this week would do well to consider Quebec.

In the middle of the last decade, the Quebec government imposed a program called Ethics and Religious Culture on all schools in the province, including home schools. A Supreme Court judgment in the legal battle that resulted is expected any day now.

The Quebec government’s scheme did not even venture into the sensitivities of sexuality. It dealt only with religion. Having dismantled its denominational school system in the 1990s, Quebec’s education ministry sought to treat religious faith as a hybrid of sociology and a Miss Manners instruction manual. The first howl of opposition came from atheist parents incensed at the idea of ethics and religion being taught in the same course. A second outcry instantly followed from parents and religious schools concerned they would be forced to accept pedagogy antithetical to their deepest beliefs.

Read the rest of this article at the Calgary Herald website.

You'll also enjoy...

The Conversation: Law, Loyola and the Common Good

Earlier this year, the Supreme Court of Canada declared the government of Quebec had breached the religious freedom of Loyola High School, a private Jesuit institution in Montreal. Paul Donovan, who led the seven-year legal battle as Loyola's principal and who became its president in April, spoke with Convivium publisher Peter Stockland about the implications of the decision for Canada's faith in common life.

Immune to Embarrassment

Even as the federal government is bringing in its new euthanasia and assisted suicide legislation, we’ll be making Cardus Health a big part of our program for 2016 and beyond. The federal government has yet to introduce medical suicide legislation and already we are witnessing the next convulsion in...

Forcing Folks to be Free

Saunders’ own brand of religious freedom can often run a bit indulgent on curious, personal affectations (you don’t eat pork? whatever) but zero tolerance on public manifestation (marriage between husband and wife? Keep it to yourself) Doug Saunders in the weekend’s Globe and Mail calls for public p...