×
Convivium was a project of Cardus 2011‑2022, and is preserved here for archival purposes.
Search
Search
Court's assisted-suicide ruling raises prospect of 'kill at will'Court's assisted-suicide ruling raises prospect of 'kill at will'

Court's assisted-suicide ruling raises prospect of 'kill at will'

The idea has quickly taken hold that the Supreme Court of Canada struck down a law prohibiting doctors from assisting at suicides. It did not, says Peter Stockland

Peter Stockland
1 minute read
The belief has grown since last Friday’s Supreme Court of Canada decision that we will have legalized doctor-assisted suicide by next year.
 
It’s a terribly mistaken assumption. We might have doctor-assisted suicide. We might just as easily have doctor, lawyer and local Hell’s Angel chieftain assisted suicide.
 
We might have an entirely lawless Canada as far as assisted suicide is concerned, what Calgary lawyer Gerry Chipeur refers to as “no country for old men.” Or middle-aged women. Or possibly even young children.
 
The misunderstanding of what might come arises from confusion over what the Supreme Court of Canada really decided. The idea has quickly taken hold that it struck down a law prohibiting doctors from assisting at suicides. It did not. It invalidated a law that prevents “everyone” — everyone — from assisting another person to commit suicide. The law also forbids anyone — anyone — from asking another person for help to commit suicide.
 
There is nothing in Section 241 of the federal Criminal Code about doctors.
 
Continue reading this article at the Calgary Herald website.

You'll also enjoy...

'There's also another line of authority in Canada'

'There's also another line of authority in Canada'

(The Cardus Daily's Peter Stockland spoke to Toronto lawyer Phil Horgan, national president of the Catholic Civil Rights League, about two events last week that brought freedom of speech to the forefront of public debate Cardus: The Supreme Court's decision last week in the William Whatcott case is ...

Competing Religions, Competing Rights, and a Court Getting it Right

Competing Religions, Competing Rights, and a Court Getting it Right

While some may be critical of the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in the controversial niqab case, I, for one, prefer the setting out of clear guidelines If women from certain religious communities know they cannot wear their niqab in court, they will be unlikely to report the crime or be willing...

Corporate Faith

Corporate Faith

Peter Stockland shares his thoughts on the implications of the Supreme Court decision regarding Loyola High School's religious rights.